A multi-program education brand serving K-12 through college admissions across 3 NYC branches. The site I designed introduces Shirely, an AI assistant that classifies parent intent, holds firm boundaries on pricing and promises, and routes confidently to branch staff when she's uncertain. ~12% interest-form conversion in the first 5 months — roughly 4× the industry average for tutoring centers.
I instrumented the site with full traffic and conversion tracking from day one — so every claim below comes with a number behind it.
5 months since launch · still climbing. Trending toward 10K+ first year.
Parents and students actively researching programs.
Industry average for tutoring centers: 2–3%. SAGE: ~4× higher.
Of parent inquiries resolved without paging branch staff.
Google ranks the site for K-12 tutoring + SAT/ACT in Queens / Long Island. SEO is now a moat.
Parents save the URL after the first visit. Returning intent is high.
All NYC branches now route intake through the site (vs. phone-first before launch).
English · Mandarin · Korean · Hindi — reflecting NYC's parent demographics.
SAGE New York is a multi-location academic enrichment and admissions-prep center for ambitious students across Queens and Long Island. Not a single-subject tutoring shop — it's a full pathway: K-12 tutoring, standardized test prep (SAT · ACT · AP · MCAT · LSAT), national academic competitions, research mentorship (SCI/SSCI publication), summer camps, and college consulting.
The brand serves families who plan ahead — parents who want structured support through multiple academic stages, from middle-school preparation to college admissions. The multi-location presence (Flushing, Little Neck, Jericho) anchors it in the NYC tutoring landscape where reputation and access matter as much as curriculum.
The client had hired and lost three designers before me. Inbound traffic to the old site was decent — SEO was working — but conversion was bleeding out. Interested parents would land on the homepage and bounce. Each previous redesign attempt failed for one of two reasons.
SAGE is a learning ecosystem. The IA had to reflect that. Previous designers built single-program landing pages that didn't communicate the breadth — parents who wanted "SAT prep + AP + research mentorship + admissions advising" couldn't see that SAGE offered all of it.
The client (founder) delegated day-to-day decisions to his most senior subordinate — an MIT-grad operations lead who knew the business cold and gave feedback the way an engineer reviews a PR: sharp, fast, and occasionally hostile. The previous designers couldn't tell the criticism from the delivery, took the tone personally, and left.
I built a communication discipline before I drew a single screen. The MIT-grad liaison knew the business at a depth I never would — every sharp comment was a piece of information about what the business actually needed. My job was to separate the criticism from the delivery and work the criticism. When the tone got personal, I returned with a prototype. When the message was unclear, I asked rather than defended.
What shipped yesterday, what's blocked, what's next. Same time every weekday. No surprises in either direction.
The client never had to imagine the result. Async walkthrough + Figma frame side by side. Decisions made with full context.
Questions answered within 1 hour during business hours. The previous designers had been "I'll get to it next week." I was not.
Even if rough. Every week the client could click through the latest version. Trust compounds from cadence — not from polish.
Nothing got lost in messaging history. Decisions were inline with the frame they applied to. Searchable, auditable, permanent.
"Let me try" beat "that won't work" every time. Half the demands I would have pushed back on turned out to be the right call once I'd tried them.
The tone softened the moment the system started compounding. By week 3 the liaison was forwarding my Looms internally — saying "this is how it should look." By week 8 we shipped on time, with the client referencing the project for their marketing.
SAGE isn't a tutoring center. It's an ecosystem with seven distinct program tracks. The IA had to make that breadth scannable without burying any single track.
Math, science, English, writing, foreign languages. Grades K through 12, with grade-appropriate instructors.
Diagnostic test → customized study plan → expert instruction → practice → flexible options (small group or 1-on-1).
PhD-led research with publishable outcomes. Students have presented at ISPOR (Health Economics & Outcomes Research).
Math Olympiad, Science Bowl, AMC, USABO, and others — coaching from instructors who placed in them.
Multi-year planning from middle school onward. School lists, essay guidance, application timeline.
Subject-specific intensives during summer break — keeps momentum, fills gaps before the next academic year.
A seventh surface — Results — collects student outcomes (acceptances, score gains, competition placements) across all six tracks. Credibility lives there.
Most education sites have a contact form. SAGE needed something more — a receptionist that could answer parent questions 24/7 in their preferred language, classify their intent into one of seven program tracks, and route them to the right branch staff when the conversation needed a human. I named her Shirely.
The same pattern I used elsewhere applied here: LLM translates intent, deterministic code decides what's allowed. Shirely understands what a parent is asking. She doesn't decide whether their child gets a scholarship, which program to enroll in, or what it costs. Those decisions live in code and in human staff — never in the model.
Every parent inquiry is classified into one of seven closed categories. The taxonomy is fixed — not free-form — because parents asking the same thing in different words should land in the same place.
| Intent | What Shirely does | Where it routes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | K-12 Tutoring | Clarifies subject + grade. Surfaces relevant tutor profiles and the closest branch. | Branch director |
| 02 | Test Prep | Identifies the test (SAT/ACT/AP/MCAT/LSAT) and timeline. Surfaces diagnostic + plan flow. | Branch director |
| 03 | Research Mentorship | Surfaces SCI/SSCI publication pathway. Past ISPOR placements as proof. | Research lead |
| 04 | Competitions | Identifies the competition + grade. Surfaces coaching schedule. | Branch director |
| 05 | College Consulting | Asks about grade, target school list, timeline. Books a consultation slot. | Consulting lead |
| 06 | Summer Camps | Filters by age + subject. Surfaces current camp roster. | Branch director |
| 07 | Pricing / Scholarship | Never answers. Routes to staff with full conversation context. | Always escalate |
Most AI chatbots fail by being too helpful. Shirely is designed with four boundaries that she'll never cross. The boundaries are constants — encoded in code, not prompts. The model cannot vote them away.
Pricing varies by program, instructor, frequency, and branch. Quoting wrong is worse than not quoting at all — it sets expectations that the staff then has to walk back. Always escalates.
"I'll get my kid a 1550." "I want a guaranteed scholarship." Shirely shares past student outcomes as ranges only — never as commitments. Marketing teams hate this. Legal teams love it.
"Hi! I'm Shirely, the AI assistant for SAGE." Parents know they're talking to a system. Trust scales when the system isn't hiding.
Parents are often anxious about their child's academic future. Shirely's tone is warm but specific — never "you're a great parent for asking!" filler. Just clear answers and the next step.
The model has confidence scores. Below 0.70, Shirely doesn't try to guess — she connects the parent with the appropriate branch director by name.
"Let me connect you with our [branch] team — they'll be the best person to answer this." Routes by branch geography (Flushing, Little Neck, Jericho) or by topic (Research → Kevin).
If Shirely has asked two clarifying questions without progress, she stops. "I want to make sure you get the right answer — let me connect you with our team."
These are deterministic routes, not model decisions. The model isn't allowed to answer them, even when it thinks it knows.
How Shirely behaves in practice — same architecture, three different parents.
The design system leans on the values parents look for in an education brand: warmth, trust, longevity. Deep brown for primary surfaces (a SAGE brand color, evoking established institutions). Cream for content backgrounds. One red accent (SAGE's existing brand) reserved for proof points — accepted schools, score percentiles, key stats.
Typography is bold and decisive — parents scanning a page should know what each program does in 3 seconds. Body copy is plain English, not edutech jargon. Every page has a results section before its features section: proof first, claims second.
Before launch, the three NYC branches relied on phone-first intake — receptionists fielding calls during business hours, missed inquiries piling up after-hours. After launch, the site became the primary intake channel for all three branches, with Shirely covering the after-hours and multi-language gap. Branch staff spent more time on enrolled students; less time on first-touch screening.
The site also became the marketing anchor: every Google Ad campaign now points to a SAGE landing page, every print piece prints the URL, every flyer the branches hand out includes a QR code. Two months of design work; an ongoing return on attention.
The MIT-grad liaison gave me feedback I didn't always want, in tones I didn't always enjoy. But she was almost always right about what the business needed. Filtering tone from content is a craft. I came out of this project better at it.
Shirely is the third project where LLM-translates / code-decides was the right split. Refund bots, multi-agent supply chain analysis, parent-facing tutoring receptionist — all the same architecture. The boundaries you draw are the product.
Parents don't buy curriculum on aesthetic. They buy on proof — past acceptances, score gains, competition placements. Every page on SAGE shows results before features. That priority order is the product, not a decoration choice.
I designed Shirely to behave like a teacher: patient, well-informed, never overselling, always pointing to the next step. The reason she works isn't that the model is good — it's that the boundaries around her are clear.